Table 5. Result of importance of resources
| | | Importance of resources | Pearson chi-square |
| Landscape | Ecological | Complex cultural | Historical cultural | Riverside leisure | Data | df | p-value |
| Gender | Male | Frequency (%) | 38 (36.5) | 43 (41.3) | 4 (3.8) | 4 (3.8) | 15 (14.4) | 12.645 | 4 | 0.013 |
| Female | ” | 24 (24.0) | 48 (48.0) | 14 (14.0) | 7 (7.0) | 7 (7.0) |
| Age | 20s | ” | 34 (33.7) | 41 (40.6) | 7 (6.9) | 4 (4.0) | 15 (14.9) | | | |
| 30s | ” | 4 (11.4) | 14 (40.0) | 7 (20.0) | 6 (17.1) | 4 (11.4) | | | |
| 40s | ” | 9 (30.0) | 18 (60.0) | 2 (6.7) | 0 (0.0) | K (3.3) | 30.991 | 16 | 0.013 |
| 50s | ” | 11 (35.5) | 15 (48.4) | 2 (6.5) | 1 (3.2) | 2 (6.5) | | | |
| More than 60s | ” | 4 (57.1) | 3 (42.9) | 0 ( 0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | | | |
| Location of survey | Field | ” | 11 (18.3) | 35 (58.3) | 4 (6.7) | 5 (8.3) | 5 (8.3) | 9.942 | 4 | 0.041 |
| Not field | ” | 51 (35.4) | 56 (38.9) | 14 (9.7) | 6 (4.2) | 17 (11.8) |
| Residence | Busan | ” | 43 (28.1) | 67 (43.8) | 16 (10.5) | 9 (5.9) | 18 (11.8) | 3.815 | 4 | 0.432 |
| Other | ” | 19 (37.3) | 24 (47.1) | 2 (3.9) | 2 (3.9) | 4 (7.8) |
| Occupation | Students | ” | 34 (33.7) | 41 (40.6) | 7 (6.9) | 4 (4.0) | 15 (14.9) | | | |
| Official | ” | 12 (37.5) | 13 (40.6) | 4 (12.5) | 1 (3.1) | 2 (6.3) | 14.074 | 12 | 0.296 |
| General | ” | 15 (23.4) | 31 (48.4) | 7 (10.9) | 6 (9.4) | 5 (7.8) |
| Professional | ” | 1 (14.3) | 6 (85.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | | | |
| Total | | ” | 62 (18.5) | 91 (27.1) | 18 (5.4) | 11 (3.3) | 22 (6.5) | - | - | - |