| 1. Causal conditions | 1.1 Willingness of decision maker | 1) Recognizing the problem of the decision maker | Visit the site and raise the issue |
| 2) Formation of improvement | Create a group of experts to direct resolution |
| Organizing a forum for the improvement of the park |
| 1.2 Capacity of design office | 1) Social participation | Participate designers in forums |
| 2) Active proposal | Forum working with basic ideas through configuration |
| Sympathy for the community briefing |
| 1.3 Trust in the design office of decision maker | 1) Relationship with the decision maker | Landscape architect capacity recognized status |
| 2) Create new designs | Complementary design progress |
| 2. Phenomenon | 2.1 Resource of site | 1) Site resource damaged | Precedence of underground railroad construction |
| Original terrain and resource degradation |
| 2) Field conservation resources | The only preserved ginkgo planting |
| 2.2 Outside influence | 1) Administrative procedure | Advisory system procedure |
| Designs go against intent |
| 2) Lack of design understanding | Lack of design knowledge of executive officers |
| Unscheduled public art competition |
| 2.3 Civil complaint | 1) User diversity | Difference in resident's attitudes by housing types |
| 2) Public and private demand | Resident's presentation and civil service requirements |
| Personal needs affect the public interest |
| 3. Context conditions | 3.1 Work efficiency | 1) Administration's attitude | Quick decision making |
| Minimize unnecessary work |
| 2) Communication and cooperation | Acceptance of the contractor's design change |
| Interagency cooperation |
| 3.2 Empathy of design | 1) Empathy for residents | Holding a number of community meetings |
| 2) Participant target | Trust in the design of the decision maker |
| Active communication of design intent to constructors |
| 3.3 Conditions change | 1) Acceptance of changes in conditions | Change in social conditions |
| Diverse awareness of change, continuous communication |
| 4. Intervening conditions | 4.1 Construction manager of expert on LA | 1) Chief of supervision | Understanding the design on supervision |
| Arbitration between the owner and the contractor |
| 2) Construction manager | Understanding and efforts of contraction office |
| Development of construction capability in progress |
| 4.2 Role of a civil officer | 1) Competence of working-level civil servants | Understanding the work of working-level officials |
| Requires proper expert organization |
| 2) Execution of administrative results | Performing administrative procedures |
| Difficulty mediating results |
| 5. Action & interactional strategies | 5.1 Landscape design supervision | 1) Design responsibility | Design supervision voluntary fulfillment |
| Efforts to maintain design |
| 2) Central role in communication  | Breakdown of field problems and respond quickly |
| 5.2 Administrative procedure simplify | 1) Reduction of interference factor | Omit park construction procedure |
| Minimize unnecessary briefing |
| 5.3 Design development effort | 1) Integrated design | Understanding relevant fields, pre-working |
| Reviews after experts in landscape design |
| 2) Collaboration progress | Collaboration of outdoor sculpture design |
| 6. Consequences | 6.1 Public park completeness | 1) Identity of park | Application of various techniques using materials |
| Emphasize park identity and meaning |
| 2) Recognition of the completion of a park | A large number of awards |
| 6.2 Degree of satisfaction | 1) User satisfaction | Excellent user satisfaction assessment |
| 2) Work participant satisfaction | A sense of pride in the performance of designers |
| 6.3 Maintainning of design intent | 1) Accordance with design | Completion of construction by maintaining design |
| 2) Inconsistent space | Lack of communication between some sections |
| 6.4 Cost and time | 1) Cost | Design and construction cost required |
| 2) Time | Time required to resolve civil complaints |
| Time supplemented by communication between related agency |