Table 7 Comparison of importance & satisfaction between A and B school

Item				CM (N=172)		GM (N=108)		t	p-value
				Mean	S.D.	Mean	S.D.
Importance	Functionality (Space & facility	⑩	Trails	4.02	.805	3.77	.973	2.224	.027*
		⑲	Eco-pond	3.55	1.028	3.92	.958	−3.010	.003**
		⑳	Animal garden	3.70	1.026	3.41	1.168	2.227	.027*
Satisfaction	Naturalness	①	Natural mood of forest	3.87	.733	3.46	.891	3.942	.000**
		②	Natural harmony of facility	3.87	.733	3.54	.911	3.166	.002**
		③	Natural shape of individual tree	3.73	.815	3.42	.929	2.989	.003**
		④	Fruit trees	3.79	.796	3.37	.923	4.040	.000**
		⑤	Harmony of evergreen and deciduous trees	3.78	.761	3.39	.926	3.725	.000**
		⑦	Harmony of flowers and trees	3.83	.881	3.57	.978	2.175	.031*
		⑧	Adequate size for perception of forest	3.65	.835	3.39	.955	2.364	.019*
	valign="middle"Functionality (Space & facility	⑩	Trails	3.88	.853	3.40	1.023	4.067	.000**
		⑫	Location of pergola and bench	3.89	.805	3.57	.929	2.908	.004**
		⑮	Location and number of info board and tree name tag	3.62	.867	3.39	.915	2.144	.033*
		⑯	Context of tree name tag	3.66	.860	3.42	.918	2.271	.024*
		⑰	Location of natural learning space	3.84	.847	3.44	.989	3.465	.001**
		⑱	Size of natural learning space	3.77	.901	3.46	.951	2.694	.007**
		⑳	Animal garden	3.74	.976	3.10	1.127	5.048	.000**
		㉑	Space diversity	3.74	.840	3.49	.932	2.354	.019*
		㉒	Accessibility	3.83	.845	3.50	.952	3.040	.003**

p<0.05
p<0.01