Table 2. Analysis of prior research on general characteristics analysis items
Classification types | Lee (2015) | An (2016) | An and Kwon (2018) | Kim and Lee (2019) | Kim and Choi (2021) |
Gender | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ |
Age | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ |
Location of survey | | | ○ | | |
Residence | | | ○ | | ○ |
Occupation | ○ | | | ○ | ○ |
Single or married | ○ | ○ | | | ○ |
Number of visits | ○ | | | | ○ |
Level of education | ○ | | | | |
Household income | ○ | | | | |
Factors | | 12 spacesa | 3 resourcesb | 5 factorsc | 5 factorsd |
Legend: waterfront landscape, green area, squares & openspaces, quality of viewing, historic resources, modern resources, convenience facilities, transport, pedestrian, suitability of width, water quality, berth & mooring
landscape resources, ecology resources, culture resources
accessibility, user convenience, facility management status, safety, landscaping and scenery
visit motivation, sincerity, emotion, satisfaction, attitude change